Wednesday, 7 May 2014

Okara, JP Clark, Ogundipe make renewed case for mother tongue in child’s early upbringing


By Anote Ajeluorou and Greg Austin Nwakunor

Ever wonder why many Europeans and other nationals living in African set up indigenous schools here and elsewhere with a strong bias for their respective local languages or mother tongues? The French, the Dutch, the Germans, the Turks, the Chinese; they all have their own schools that teach their respective local languages besides the broader curriculum for examination purposes. Like the tortoise and his ancient shell, these Europeans go everywhere with their local languages or mother tongues just as, ironically, they have labelled African languages ‘vernacular’ that should be banned!
  As a result, African children, nay many Nigerian children, raised even in their home towns and villages now speak very little of their mother tongues preferring instead to speak ‘English’, Nigeria’s official language of communication, business and prestige. Needless to say, those with abilities to write the mother tongues are dwindling by the second. In most cases, it’s the bible that is the only surviving written material or text of most local languages; the much-talked about threat of indigenous language extinction couldn’t be more real for a majority of African languages than this.
  It’s against this bleak background that some three Nigerian and African writers, scholars and academics spoke at the recent handover to Port Harcourt city UNESCO World Book Capital 2014 baton. Eminently qualified to speak on this vexing issue and condemn negative attitudes regarding neglect of mother tongues both at homes and in schools were Dr. Gabriel Okara, Prof. JP Clark and §prof. Omolara Ogundipe, currently at the Department of English Studies at University of Port Harcourt. They spoke at different sessions during the weeklong literary events that accompanied the handover ceremony designed to stimulate interests in books that open windows of opportunities to those who make them lifelong companions.
  Okara, a poet and children’s writer, was responding to a question on his major prose work The Voice, which he wrote back in the 1960s, and why he peppered it with a lot of Izon elements and ambience. Okara, who turned 93 on April 24, was engaged on sundry literary and national issues embedded in his writing. For Okara, the language issue is a touching and even personal one. It’s akin to an elder watching a tethered goat give and unable to do anything to help. He affirmed that his desire to preserve his native Izon language prompted him to create an essentially Izon ambience in the novel, as a way of rescuing his language from dying out outright.
  For Okara and a host of other discerning intellectuals and thinkers, a grasp of the mother tongue is a key element in deepening intellectual pursuits, as it prepared the basis for a clearer understanding of concepts. Okara maintained that Africa was losing a lot as a result of abandoning its mother tongues for foreign languages.
  He said, “By using English as a means of communication, we’re losing some ofour values. When we try to translate from our languages, we lose some of our meanings and values. And if we lose our local languages, we lose our culture as well, as language is carrier of a people’s culture!”
  For Clark also, poet, playwright and first African to be appointed to a chair in an English department of a university, abandonment of mother tongue that seems the modern fad in raising children both in the cities and villages by most parents is so disheartening, as it amounts to emptying out the soul of a continent and replacing it with hollowness. His mood, while speaking on the issues, was that of melancholy and loss of all that is dear and enduring. He said he was to realise the loss he was also aiding to perpetuate late in the day, and admitted being complicit in the language betrayal and but couldn’t do much about it afterwards as a writer.
  Clark said he only came to realisation at University College, Ibadan that all the great English poets and writers he’d read at Government College, Ughelli, were actually writing in their mother tongue or local language. He recalled his maternal uncle, Debesi, an Urhobo, who was a great poet, composer and singer of Udje performance poetry, whom he’d seen perform as a child and compared his prodigious performance talent with those of the English poets he’d been taught in school like Chaucer, Wordsworth, Byron, Blake and the rest and found no greater talent in these English men than in his uncle. As an act of redemption and restoration, he quickly began to translate some of his uncle’s song-poems into English like ‘The Death of Okrika’, a moving dirge on the loss of a newly wed bride, and those of others he could find.
  He also translated the Ijaw epic Ozidi into English and which performance he helped midwife in the 1960s; it all stemmed from this need to resurrect his mother tongues – Urhobo and Izon – into mainstream linguistic recognition.
  He regretted, however, that he didn’t write his poetry and plays in either Ijaw or Urhobo (his mother being Urhobo), something he can’t start doing all over again. But having realised the mistake of his generation of writers in not using their respective local languages like their Kenyan counterpart, Ngugi wa Thiong’o (author of Weep Not Child), Clark encourages younger writers to try and reverse the trend by writing in their local languages. Clark said, “try and take back your mother tongues in your writing in indigenous languages and not just write in English alone. Let the children grow up in your mother tongue. Do it well by knowing it well. At a conference of writers, wa Thiong’o wanted us to write in our local languages but we were all doing this in English”.
  Coming from a man of Clark’s stature, and being humbled by such generational mistake, as pioneer writer and thinker, this must mean something. Educational policymakers would only do well to listen and learn.
  Late Prof. Babs Fafunwa’s 6-3-3-4 education policy of the late 1980s was designed to redress this language difficulty when it prescribed that the first few years of a child’s education should be in his or her mother tongue. But this was soon jettisoned for a host of logistical problems and a lack of commitment.
  But to complete the mother tongue proposition at the Port Harcourt UNESCO World Book Capital 2014 was Prof. Ogundipe. She spoke at the Chinua Achebe’s Arrow of God@50 Celebration sub-event commemorating Achebe’s second novel that turns 50 this year. For this first female to graduate first class in English from University of London at University College, Ibadan, the place of mother tongue in a child’s early education is key. She narrated how, as a child, her mother, an English teacher, forbade them from speaking any language other than Yoruba at home. It was not until she entered the school system and at advance classes that she first encountered English. She went on to make superlative grade in it.
  For parents who erroneously assume that exposing a child to English at an early stage would aid him or her, Prof. Ogundipe has a shocker for them in her own personal experience, which should serve as shinning model. According to her, “My mother, an English teacher, didn’t encourage us to speak English at home, but I went on to get 7As in my school certificate and the first Nigerian woman to get a first class at University of London!”
  She said those of them who went through that process spoke better English and charged parents to be at the forefront of instituting mother tongues in schools, as they stood more to gain by so doing. Ogundipe opined that language embodies a whole set of values, particularly African values, which she said were already being lost with the entrenchment of a foreign language. She frowned at how Nigerians, especially those in the Diaspora, shun their local languages and actively promoted its abandonment. She said efforts to set up a Yoruba language study centre in the U.S. some years ago to help Yoruba children failed because of poor parents’ attitude towards the project.
  “Parents should fight for the institution of mother tongues in schools, at home and through study centres”, Ogundipe noted. “Parenting is also at the heart of the mother tongue debacle. Parents need to change their attitudes towards their mother tongues, and it should start from homes where mother tongue should be encouraged”.
  Also lending his voice to the debate was former Association of Nigerian Authors (ANA), Dr. Wale Okediran and National Organising Chairman (NOC) for the Arrow of God@50 Celebration. He argued that Achebe, the late literary icon, although wrote his prose works in English, was passionate about his Igbo language and tradition, which he made popular in his works. He said Achebe also wrote some of his poems in Igbo language, adding, “The Achebes, even though had western education, were steeped in African tradition. Too bad we moderns forget the traditional ways as we educate our children in English”.

Prince Erediauwa, Obong of Calabar, CBAAC endorse Imasuen’s Invasion 1897 epic film


By Anote Ajeluorou

As the countdown to its July 20 worldwide premiere approaches, Lancelot Oduwa Imasuen’s epic film Invasion 1897 continues to enjoy the blessings of royalty in his native Benin Kingdom and beyond. The latest pat in the back came from no other personage than the Bini Crown Prince, the man who will be the next Oba of Benin, Edaiken N’Uselu, Eheneden Erediauwa.
  Imasuen’s historical and culture-grounded film has also nudged awake a certain cultural renaissance in the ancient kingdom, with a flurry of activities in the city designed to redefine and re-evaluate the rich culture for which the Edo people are renowned. The crown prince also visited the Obong of Calabar and the last known abode of his grand ancestor, Oba Ovonramwen, who was over thrown by the invading British and subject of Imasuen’s epic film.
  At the premiere of the film in Benin City, Prince Erediauwa, will unveil Benin Royal Dynasty Trust, a no-for-profit and non-political organisation incorporated on February 26, 2013. The aim of the trust is to put Edo cultural heritage in the sun. Born in 1953 to the current Oba of Benin, Omo N’Oba N’Uku Akpolokplo, Oba Erediauwa, the Prince was Nigeria’s Ambassador to Norway and Angola. He would bring his wealth of diplomatic experience to bear in running the trust and see to the proper flowering of Edo culture, which celebration has been somewhat dimmed and less known to the outside world except its famous bronze works that adorn museums abroad.
  Indeed, the intervention of a high profile personage as Prince Eheneden from the royal house might spark renewed debate about Benin stolen art. Imasuen’s Invasion 1897 is at the heart of this issue. Oba Ovonramwen was sacked to pave way for the looting of Benin ancient royal art, and his death in 1914 paved the way for British direct rule in the country.
  In supporting the film together with its planned art exhibition that will focus on the bronze works made specifically for the film, Prince Erediauwa might be saddled with the task of reopening the case for a return of the stolen royal art of his royal lineage.
  For the Binis, Imasuen’s film will be a renaissance of lost glory. Oba Ovonramwen was such prodigious monarch; his travail, notwithstanding, he is still revered till date because of what he symbolised for the Bini people, a man who stood his ground against the thieving and murderous British in their quest for stolen lands and property.
  And as the last African king to resist the British, Ovonramwen is symbolic of African resistance against foreign domination. Importantly, it was not until Oba Ovonramwen’s death on January 1, 1914 that the British brought together the two protectorates to bring Nigeria into existence.
  In a related development, Crown Prince Erediauwa recently paid a historic, bilateral royal visit to the Obong of Calabar, Edidem Ekpo Okon Abasi Otu, in his palace in Calabar. The visit was to strengthen cultural relations between the two royal houses of Benin and Calabar, particularly so the Benin prince could familiarise himself with the place where his royal forebear last lived.
  According to Imasuen, who used the opportunity to present his film to the Calabar royal father, said the purpose of the visit was to continue the cultural ties between the two royal houses and to connect Prince Erediauwa firsthand with the last known abode of his great forebear. He said the Benin royal house, with the support of the Obong and the government of Cross River State, has acquired where Ovonramwen was last held, where the Benin Royal Dynasty Trust would build a befitting museum in his honour. He noted that the Obong was receptive of the film idea and made the delegation warm welcome.
  Prince Erediauwa used the occasion to appeal to the Calabar monarch to host Invasion 1897 film premiere in his domain. As a result, the film would now be premiered in four cities in the country – first in Benin City at Kada Cinema on July 20, before Lagos and Abuja. The London premiere is scheduled for August 16. Imasuen expressed his excitement at the opportunity to meet and present his film to the revered ruler of the Efik people, saying, “It’s a huge thing for me and the film industry”.
  It will be recalled that Esama of Benin Kingdom, Chief Gabriel Igbinedion, had earlier endorsed Invasion 1897 at his palatial home, GRA, Benin City. Also, Centre for Black African Art and Culture (CBAAC) has lent its support for Imaeun’s historic film. In a letter of endorsement signed by the centre’s Director-General, Prof. Tunde Babawale, said, “The Centre is impressed by the interest the epic film has generated since its production and we are proud to be associated with it. The Centre is particularly happy that the production of this film would lend voice to the campaign for return of those cultural patrimonies that were carted away during the infamous British expedition to Benin Kingdom and other places where such objects were stolen or looted.
  “We believe the film will show African’s attachment to those materials and correct impressions that countries of origin where such artifacts were illegally taken away are incapable of taking care of them when returned. The film will also help in preserving, propagating and retaining memories of Africa’s rich cultural heritage. The Centre hereby endorses the film project and encourages other organisations to support this laudable initiative”.

Re-appraising Nigeria’s leadership conundrum in light of Achebe’s Arrow of God@50


By Anote Ajeluorou and Kenechukwu Ezeonyejiaku

Father of African literature, late Prof. Chinua Achebe, has left an impressive legacy in the literary world. Perhaps, nowhere else is this legacy better felt and more enduring than in his treatise of leadership problems that have continued to bedevil his beloved country and continent. The issue of leadership was so close to his heart that he devoted a slim volume to it in The Trouble with Nigeria after he’d delved into partisan politics in the 1980s when he joined Peoples Redemption Party (PRP).
  But even in his preceding literary works, particularly Arrow of God, Achebe shows concern for this critical problem of development. Although set in colonial times, Arrow of God still speaks for the current times in its pragmatic approach to how leadership is handled, citizens’ response to it and obligations of those saddled with it. A re-reading of the 50-year old novel yields interesting and compelling parallels with Nigeria’s current democratic march; it also helpfully points the way forward to ways of avoiding the pitfalls that have dodged Nigeria’s heels.
  As the novel turns 50 this year since its publication in 1964, drums were rolled out in its celebration in eight cities across Nigeria – Ibadan, Utuoke, Abuja, Lagos, Awka, Port Harcourt and Sokoto. The Ogidi event, hometown of the author, didn’t hold due to logistic problems. And to underscore the core issue at the heart of the novel, ‘Literature, Leadership and National Unity’ was chosen as theme.
  Perhaps, no other novel by the venerable author mirrors Nigeria’s leadership crisis more accurately than Arrow of God. Umuaro, just like Nigeria, is a federation of six villages that came together to form one nation by a necessity of survival when faced with the threat of extinction from Abami warriors, who were always on the offensive. The six villages of Umuaro came together and created a powerful medicine, Ulu, to protect them, Ulu’s chief priest being Ezeulu. The Abami warriors could be likened to military rule from which Nigeria’s current democratic dispensation emerged, with democracy being the modern-day Ulu to save the country from the onslaught the military wrought on the body polity.
  Synonymous with democracy also is the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that has ruled since 1999; and democracy or PDP’s chief priests being Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Musa Yar’Adua and now Goodluck Jonathan. How has leadership fared in the hands of these chief priests? What has been the people’s response to their leadership styles? What precipitate roles have the people played in helping to shape or derailing how they are led? Have the leaders and the led play complimentary roles to advance development or have they been at variance or at each other throats?
  In Arrow of God, Ezeulu suffers certain political reverses arising from antagonism from Nwaka and Ezeidemili, perhaps akin to what All Progressive Congress (APC) is giving to the ruling PDP. Ezeulu’s subsequent actions are defined by this antagonism. He is imprisoned by the white, colonial overlord and is unable to perform his duty of eating the remaining two sacred yams in service of Ulu; a spill over ensues and the people are grounded. They cannot harvest their yam since their chief priest refuses to eat more than one yam at a time, as required.
  The issue of colonial overlord is also fresh in Nigeria’s recent memory. International Monetary Fund’s boss, Christine Lagarde visits Nigeria December 2011 and by January 1, 2012, petroleum subsidy is removed to occasion the biggest people’s revolt against their government. When Ezeulu fails to eat the sacred yams, the Christian Missionary Church makes capital gain of it and asks faithful and pagans alike to bring their yams to the church for their protection. This they gladly do, and it spells the end of Ulu and Ezeulu’s reign as sovereign god and chief priest over them.
  Indeed, Nigerian leaders who wish to make impact on the lives of the people would do well to read Arrow of God and learn a lesson or two from Ezeulu’s political ascendancy and eventual fall. Two of other of Achebe’s fictional treatises on politics that leaders should advisedly read are A Man of the People and Anthills of the Savannah. They are instructive if fictional works that plumb the depths of leadership issues, particularly how the continent was still battling with wrong leadership application, especially in Achebe’s home country, Nigeria.

AT the University of Ibadan (then University College, Ibadan, where Achebe studied) where the 50th year celebration of Arrow of God started, America’s Associate Professor of Conflict Resolution, Human Security, Global Governance at University of Massachusetts, Boston, Dr. Darren Kew, placed emphasis on civil society groups, as key element in checking the excesses of leaders and keeping them reined in, as they perform their civic duties to the citizenry. Kew said Nigeria’s democratic march has been hampered by the absence of a social contract between the government and the people.
  As a result, the culture of holding political leaders or government accountable for lack of performance was yet to be entrenched in the country. What is needed, Kew noted, is a viable opposition and a strong civil society group constantly on the look out to make government live up to its electoral promises.
  For Kew the absence of social contract in Nigeria’s democracy between government and the people in which the state only exists to serve the will of the people, who are the source of all political power enjoyed by the state, who can also choose to give or withhold this power was reason for government acting with impunity, as if the people did not exist. For instance, when outcomes of elections do not flow from people’s balloting but through rigging and other election maleficence, it becomes difficult for such government to genuinely serve the will of the people but that of its own self-interests, as is currently the case in the country.
  For Kew, who has monitored four elections in Nigeria, democracy as a system of learning the best ideals to run a society, needs a virile opposition as an essential element in creating a balance of power for the polity so the ruling party does not ride roughshod. Also because the opposition has interest in capturing power at the centre in the contestation for power, Kew argued that the opposition always has interest in ensuring clean elections and exposing corruption by reaching out to civil society groups and mobilizing the public in a bid to win elections.
  “Social contract is what is missing in Nigerian democracy, as there was not yet a sense of political contest, which takes time to be built”, he argued. He added that All Progressive Congress (APC) was still terribly fragile at the moment to act as the true opposition needed to put the ruling Peoples Democratic Party on its toes in the contestation for power required of a true democratic society.
  Kew described Nigeria as semi-democratic in human development index (HDI) valuation. He further noted that it was hard as yet for “ethical leaders to get into power (in Nigeria). Civil society and the greater public are key groups in determining governance, free and fair elections. Trade unions are still an essential actor in the political process”.
  In each of the cities, the play adaptation of Arrow of God either as When the Arrow Rebounds or Ezeulu was staged to the delight of audiences.

IN a celebratory dirge performed for the African literary icon Achebe by former Head of Department of English, University of Lagos and an award-winning author in Lagos last week, Prof. Akachi Adimora-Ezeigbo said of him: “Ude gi na-ede n’Igbo na oru; ma n’onwu, ma na ndu”, meaning: “Your aura resonates both at home and in the Diaspora, in life and in death.”
  These legacies, of which Arrow of God is one, has prompted a worldwide celebration of the golden jubilee of the book’s publication in over 70 countries of the world which has been observed early in the year in India, Bangladesh, United States of America, Russia, other parts of Asia and later in the year in Africa, Europe, South America and many universities around the world.
  At the Afe Babalola Hall, University of Lagos, venue of the celebration in Lagos, students, literary enthusiasts, dignitaries, prominent foreign and local writers and scholars turned out to pay tributes, present papers themed around the re-appraisal of the book, Arrow of God in the light of the messages and literary construct it has for pushing the concepts of literature, leadership and national unity in the modern times for Nigeria and Africa.
  While speaking at the event, a retired Professor of African Literature at American University, U.S., Prof. Charles Larson said the works of the late icon would remain with us forever, adding that he’d taught in a small school in the then Eastern Region in a town called Oraukwu in now Anambra State, and revealed how he went to a bookshop in Onitsha where he discovered that Achebe had written his third book, Arrow of God, which he immediately bought for three shillings.
  Being the first person in America to offer a class based on African literature, Larson noted that prior to his coming to Nigeria in 1962, the American curriculum was void of anything African, Asia and Latin America and that his education was shallow as a result. He stated that his coming to Nigeria changed his life just as he admitted that Chinua Achebe also changed his intellectual outlook on life.
  According to him, “Arrow of God is the most complete novel and many of us think this is his foremost novel. He wrote a great African novel, Things Fall Apart and he wrote many other major novels and this makes him the great African writer. But it’s not just because he wrote those novels, but what he brought into these novels. He restored the African power; he recaptured Africa’s heritage in those novels in a way that nobody had done at that time and he restored pride in African culture.
  “You can say that Chinua Achebe shaped the literature of the African continent and I can say that no writer anywhere else in the world has had such an impact on the literature of his continent. He changed the shape of world literature. World literature has never been the same because of Chinua Achebe and for me, he changed my entire life but what I will really like to say is that what Chinua Achebe gave was giving light to the African continent. He illuminated the African continent in a way that had never been done before.”
  Former President, Association of Nigerian Authors (ANA) and former member of Federal House of Representative who is the chairman, National Organizing Committee of the celebration, Dr, Wale Okediran, said that the various programmes mapped out for the celebration were designed to help reinvigorate the reading culture in the country and at the same time encourage students and scholars to look at the celebration’s theme which is “Literature, Leadership and National Unity.”
  He, however, noted that plans were underway to make the celebration of Achebe’s life and legacy an annual event whereby students and visitors would be invited to Ogidi to see the birth place of the writer, look at the primary school he attended, visit his ancestral home as is done for other great writers around the world.

IN Port Harcourt, Okediran, said it was a challenging but very exciting assignment and thanked organisers of UNESCO Port Harcourt World Book Capital for incorporating Arrow of God@50 event, as part of its programmes. He emphasized that celebrating the book would “rev up reading culture and reawaken how we can adopt the book, as National Conference material because of its leadership qualities”.
  America’s Achebe scholar and professor of Comparative Literature, Prof. Natasha Vaubel of Indiana University, said she became Achebe convert after Achebe accused the west of never listening to other people tell their own stories themselves. Vaubel stressed the need for people to tell their own stories themselves, “because stories matter and they are not innocent. Books and stories can be windows, but they can lie and lock us in a box”.
  She said countering the lies stories such as Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness tell about Africa and its people was Achebe’s lifelong mission as a writer, and for which he became famous.

ALSO in Sokoto, the emphasis was on women, their roles in society and how they can be helped to achieve their destinies in a patriarchal society. Although women do not feature prominently in Arrow of God, their seeming silence is cause for concern of some feminine advocates, who feel that Achebe was so crucial a writer to leave out women while discussing the all important place of leadership in society.
  However, a don at Usman Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Aisha Umar Mohammad, reinforced the presence of women in the novel by the sheer passivity of their roles, as mothers, homemakers doing all the jobs in the home that make their men engage in war pastime and in political affairs of the community. In her paper, ‘Passivity and Identity: The Women in Achebe’s Arrow of God’, she argued that the absence of women in the novel tallies with how women were held in pre-colonial Africa, and still held even now to a large extent, as beings not deserving attention.
  Also, Ibrahim Daniel of Department of General and Liberal Studies, Niger State Polytechnic, Zungeru, spoke on ‘Slave Mentality and Gender Discourse in Contemporary Nigeria’. He spoke on the need to empower the girl child in order to liberate her from the slave mentality in which she is enmeshed. Muhammad Tahir Mallam, while speaking on ‘(Mis)Conception of Leadership  and the Tragedy in Arrow of God’ effectively tied leadership to the health of a nation, noting that Umuaro as a federal system had its internal tensions, just as Nigeria is currently undergoing and advocated strong leadership to help overcome protracted problems.
  Also on hand to weigh in on feminine issues in Sokoto were House Committee Chairman on Diaspora, Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, who chaired the plenary session and former House member and Nigeria’s Ambassador-designate to Ireland, Dr. Bolero Ketebo. While commending organisers of Arrow of God@50 Celebration, Dabiri-Erewa, said celebrating Achebe was particularly worth it. She asked that women and girls be given all the responsibilities of leadership and they would perform well.
  She, however, noted that women attaining their full potentiality in politics was an uphill task, as all the political party structures in the country, where decisions are taken, were still not headed by women, a situation she said was problematic for the growth of women.
  She noted, “Leadership is our problem in this country. We must demand for our rights. Things are falling apart, as Achebe says. But during elections the women don’t go out to vote. Your vote is your power; use it wisely. If leaders know your vote will get him or her in or out of power, they will take you seriously. If they know your vote counts, they will sit up”.
  For Ketebo, women should fight for political offices just like their male counterparts and not wait for anybody to hand over power to them, as it was a pipe dream. She stated, “Nobody gives political power to anybody! I prefer bottom-top approach to leadership issues. Which woman is a local government council chairman? We ought to start from there and climb upwards. We cannot shy away from our responsibilities. Women should try and speak to the men in their lives.
  “Also, the challenge is to Northern women; you have more responsibility than women in the South. After Prof. Zainab Alkali, no other Northern woman has become notable in writing ever since. So, for every assignment for women in the South, Northern women have 10!”
  Hon. Ketebo also praised the continent’s ancestors for leaving their offsprings with the timeless proverbs that pepper Achebe’s literary works. Prof. (Mrs.) Asabe Kabir Usman of Modern European Languages and Linguistics had spoken extensively on the Igbo proverbs that form the fulcrum of Achebe’s writing and how they foster societal unity, peaceful coexistence and conflict management in Arrow of God.
  Ketebo noted, “We take these proverbs for granted and pay little respect to our forebears’ foresight in coining these timeless proverbs”.